![difference between the motif xf and the montage difference between the motif xf and the montage](https://techbuckarch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Yamaha-MOXF8-vs-Montage-3.jpg)
But I love 8 parts per Performance and it appears that we can edit much much more (everything?) about each Part at the Performance level? That was a limitation in XF that caused me to create alot of almost redundant voices - certain parameters I couldn’t edit at the XF Performance level. are these now “Parts”? is there a “Parts” library that holds all these basic blocks to build a performance? I’m guessing we can’t create custom Parts and just save them as Parts? That part of the Montage architecture I still dont’ understand. Where is an AP? a basic JP detuned synth? a Clav? etc. so we can’t design and save basic “voices” as we understood them? My understanding is that as a concept is gone, and Performance is the fundamental level. maybe tweak it to a new voice and save as a new voice. We’ll take this voice and use it in many places (performances, songs, etc.).
![difference between the motif xf and the montage difference between the motif xf and the montage](https://www.amazound.com/store/image/cache/catalog/MTF/mtf_dynopiano-512x512.jpg)
![difference between the motif xf and the montage difference between the motif xf and the montage](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/D01Mx5BlSEM/maxresdefault.jpg)
in XF we created voices as our building blocks. One of the things I’ve yet to understand as I haven’t seen one in person… Has anyone seen specs on the base waveforms in the Montage vs XF? I think they expanded memory by orders of magnitude, did they create larger longer etc samples?Īll in all, if you’re not using the XF sequencer to do advanced music production, I’m going to guess Montage is more and better for performers.